Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Jeremiah Project

Socialists in the House

Henry WaxmanBarney FrankJohn ConyersCharles RangelJerrold NadlerMelvin WattMaxine Waters

 In Washington D.C. there is powerful and popular lobby called the Progressive Caucus which is openly espousing the principles of socialism and who have signed onto the agenda of the Democratic Socialists of America.
 According to their statement of purpose, "The Progressive Caucus is organized around the principles of social and economic justice, a non-discriminatory society and national priorities which represent the interests of all people, not just the wealthy and the powerful.
 Our purpose is to present thoughtful, practical solutions to the economic and social problems facing America. Our people-based agenda extends from job creation to job training, to economic conversion, to single payer healthcare reform, to adequate funding for the AIDS crisis, to environmental reform, and to women's rights.
 Now that the cold war is over, this nation's budget and overall priorities must reflect that reality. We support further cuts in outdated and unnecessary military spending, a more progressive tax system in which wealth taxpayers and corporations contribute their fair share, and a substantial increase in social programs designed to meet the needs of low-and-middle-income American families. We believe that these goals fit within an overall commitment to deficit reduction."

Democratic-Socialist Reform

 We have been told that Socialism is all right, when in fact it is not all right. It is slavery with a beautiful face.
 We are told that we can have Socialist reform and still be a Democratic nation. Deceptive and misguided politicians in both the Republican and Democratic parties, and the International Bankers, tell us that Democratic-Socialism is in the middle of the road between Communism and Fascism, and that we need a Democratic-Socialist state as we go into the 21st. Century with its global economy.
 Nothing could be further from the truth. Socialist reform is a means to consolidate and control wealth. Why do you suppose that bankers and the super-rich promote it? Because the idea that socialism is a share-the-wealth program is strictly a confidence game to get the people to surrender their freedom to an all-powerful collective. As a result, through the legislative process, like sheep going to slaughter, Americans are willingly and slowly sacrificing their liberty in exchange for the false promises of an increasingly Socialist State.

 Simply put, socialism is defined as "a theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor." [Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)] It is an economic system based on state ownership of capital. It is the antithesis of what America is ... it is contrary to our capitalistic society.
 What socialism amounts to is government ownership and/or control over the basic means of production and distribution of services and goods. This means the government controls everything, including you.
 In Socialism everything is regulated by the government and everything you do is monitored by the government. While we may not have yet reached the point where the state tells you what color you can paint your house, how many children you may have, etc., instead the government tells you where you can build your homes, your businesses, and even how much food storage you are entitled too.

 Americas slide toward Socialism can be seen as early as 1929 following the Stock Market Crash, when America suddenly needed a "New Deal" in the form of social welfare. The rate of the transformation has been increased in recent years by the United Nations, whose entire purpose is to implement a Socialist World Order.
 America's gravitation toward socialism has been long-term and precedes even the arrival of Bill and Hillary Clinton in the White House. Economist Milton Friedman recently observed that "in 1950, total government spending, federal, state, and local, amounted to less than 30 percent of national income; in 1992, to nearly 45. In addition, government-mandated expenditures by individuals and businesses have multiplied manifold ... The U.S. is today more than half socialist, compared to perhaps a third in 1950." [Rush Limbaugh, See, I Told You So, pg. 267.]

For additional information check out the following:

The Illuminati

Skull & Bones Society

Lies & Deceptions of Neofeminists

American Land Rights Association Action Alerts

Inform America
Do you love America? How about the IRS?

The search for truth is a dangerous thing!

 There are the social and political voices talking about the unfair distribution of wealth and resources - that a global system of sharing and redistribution could remedy the social problems of cross-national envy, and that if this were addressed, a major component of international strife and war would be removed forever.
 Clinton's "Bridge into the 21st Century" is built on the crumbled moorings of the past. It is the same bridge built by the "New Deal" of FDR and the "Great Society" of LBJ. These bridges led us into the abyss of unprecedented big government. Our toll was a loss of freedom and dignity, and our destination decades of encroaching bureaucracy and generations addicted to the hand of government.
 Clinton's favorite answer to all questions is government. Got a problem? Bill Clinton's new government program can fix it. Lost your job? Sign up for an employee retraining program. Feeling a little under the weather? A visit to your regional health alliance will shape you up. Originally created to defend and protect, our government is now being asked to provide. In short, many Americans today think the government must be the answer to all societal problems. And as the problems grow, so must the government.
 Traditionally, Democrats have stood for big government, far-reaching federally controlled and federally funded programs and taxation at levels to match.
 In the simplest of terms, the sum of Bill Clinton's administration amounts to a federal government takeover of the management of American business, health care, education and the American family. Clinton's actions over the past few years demonstrate that he envisions much more than mere renewal or reform; he wants to create an entirely new society controlled by a massive Socialist government. One has to only scan through a few of Clinton's policies in economic, spending, and tax strategy to see that sovereignty and personal freedoms are the items actually targeted for reduction.

Bill Clinton's Foundational Philosophy for the Socialist State

 At his acceptance speech, President Clinton singled out Dr. Carroll Quigley as being one whom helped to form his political outlook. Quigley was a liberal academic with a very identifiable world view. Quigley is known principally for his 1,338 page tome called Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Times originally published in 1966.
 Quigley wrote approvingly of the power, influence and activities of what he called "the network" that tries to rule the Western world. The "network" always prefers Big Government, big federal spending, and the stability of a planned society rather than the uncertainties of the free market. One example of the power of the network is the way it has forced the American taxpayers to spend some $10 billion a year on foreign giveaways every year since World War II.
 Quigley described the Council on Foreign Relations as one of several "front" organizations set up by the network for the purpose of advancing its internationalist schemes. He boasted: "I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for 20 years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." Quigley asserted that he was personally acquainted with the dynastic families of the super-rich, and he traced their immense power and influence. For the most part, he was a fan of their goals and policies and said that his chief difference with the "network" was that "it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
 The "Hope" in his book's title represented the collectivist one-world society that will exist when the "network" achieves its goal of consolidating its rule. All who resist this man-made millennium represent the "Tragedy," and Quigley asserted that it was too late for ordinary people to fight it.

-



Updated
January 10, 1999

Email


Alarm
Wake Up!

There is a storm coming!




The Clinton Agenda
What's the true agenda behind all the rhetoric?



Clinton's Vision for the 21st. Century
Where does the bridge to the 21st Century lead?



Taxes
Who is enslaving your children with debt?



{short description of image}
Welfare: Is It Biblical?




The False Green Gospel

Environmentalism



Guard
War on Christianity

Those who are working for the dissolution of our society have a spiritual agenda.



The Impact of Feminism on the Family
"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking marriage."



The Homosexualization of America
So what's wrong with being gay, anyway?


America's Godly Heritage
What children are not taught and how historical revisionists are influencing culture.

Living in a Post-Christian Culture


Cash Grab
Money, Money, Money
Your money, my money, any money ... They want it!



Christians in Politics
American politics is not any longer about Democrats, Republicans, or Independents ... It's not a fight between the Liberal Left and the Christian Right ... It is all about what America is.



Philosophical Roots of Change

How did we get to where we're at?



Justice Redefined
The redefining of justice and injustice is a prophetic sign of the last days.



The Slippery Slope
Once government begins to define life and humanity, there is no end to the possibilities for subjective and selective determination as to who will be allowed to live.


Exporting Clinton's Culture of Death


Jesus Saves
Are You Saved?


 The economic comrade of Clinton's who, though appointed to no official post, helped form his economic strategy is Derek Shearer, longtime associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, "which is committed to socialism in America and sides with the Soviet Union on almost every important foreign policy issue," according to a 1988 article in Policy Review. Shearer favors socialism, but don't look for the words communist or socialism to show up any time soon in Clinton's speeches or policy announcements.
 In the book Economic Democracy, written with Martin Cornoy, Shearer says corporations are too "impersonal and powerful" and that a strategy to achieve economic democracy "must start by dismantling, or at least restricting, the power of these corporations." Shearer and Carnoy call for a "democratically" planned economy - one planned by government bureaucrats. They also call for nothing less than complete government control of capital markets. "A strategy of reform," they write, "must transfer capital from the corporations to the public.... The logical vehicle for that process should be the government." The objective, according to the book, is to provide a vehicle for governmental takeovers of entire industries "without the immediate financial and ideological burdens that large-scale nationalization efforts would entail." This has been and continues to be attempted with the Clinton Health Care plans and recent government intervention into the tobacco industry.

 America is quickly becoming a Socialist State. The following things are characteristic of socialistic forms of government proposed by the Democratic Party and illustrated by Hillary Clinton's "village".

  • The individual loses all rights and everything is done in the name of the commonwealth (public) (read - "village"); you are officially the property of the state and not an individual with wants, desires, and needs.
     There is only the rich and the commonwealth. If you are not rich, then you are a member of the commonwealth. The needs and wants of the rich come before the needs and wants of the commonwealth. In the commonwealth there are no individuals and no one has any rights whatsoever. All decisions in your behalf are made by the state. Your children are the property of the state and it is decided by the state what they will learn, who will teach them, and what will become of them. As a parent, you have little or no say in what becomes of your children, all decisions are made by the government and you accept or become an enemy of the state.
  • The government owns and/or controls the basic means of production and distribution of services and goods. We are told that business and other things will be regulated but that we will still be free. Free to do what? They will operate under the illusion of a free enterprise system. All business and land, if not owned by the government or the rich, is controlled and taxed very heavily. What a contradiction of terms. How can anyone have a Socialist form of government with freedom? As stated, in a Socialist form of government the rich rule and have the power, not the people.
     Consider the actions the government has taken in recent years concerning tobacco, health care, the environment, and the airline industry.
     Vice President Al Gore recently announced new efforts to make air travel safer and Americans seem eager to accept the further erosion of their rights and pay even higher tarifs to government to protect them from an unseen enemy. One lady I recently travelled with told me that she was willing to undergo an extensive selective search of her luggage "if it would make traveling safer." Safer than what? I ask. This administration has taken advantage of the crash of TWA 800 to play on the fears of American travellers. It would seem a foregone conclusion that the airplane was brought down by a terrorist act - regardless of the fact there is no conclusive evidence to date that it was a criminal act. This heightened state of security at American airports is nothing more than another ploy of the government to further control the airline business and raise another "hidden" tax to pay for it.
  • The creation of a federal or state police force; the purpose of which is to put down disturbances, political or otherwise, "root" out political enemies, ensure the loyalty of the people, and enforce laws upon taxation, population control, religion, the workplace, and the family unit.
     Consider Clinton's now infamous 100,000 more police officers on the street. Along with the government funded of those officers comes the federal control over how the recipients of the funding are used. Will this new police force be held accountable like the FBI? Attorney General Janet Reno promoted Larry Potts—who coordinated the Waco raid and was censured for his role in the 1992 Ruby Ridge, Idaho, shoot-out -- to deputy director of the FBI.
  • The subjection or elimination, generally the latter, of all religious institutions, with the exception of a state approved and mandated religion. This "New World Order" institution will also be used to ensure the loyalty of the people and will be used in the collection of taxes.

 The Clinton presidency obviously presents a clear and present danger to the traditional American way of life that has been grounded in Judeo-Christian principles. But a much greater danger is on the horizon. This danger is the socialistic serpentine worldwide government that the Scriptures say will emerge in the end times (Rev. 13:7-8). This world empire, based in a reunified Europe, will abrogate the sovereignty of every other nation on the face of the earth. Its government will be run by godless, amoral Humanists who will worship the creation rather than the Creator (Romans. 1:25).

 The average American Citizen isn't going to give up his Constitution for some World Government too easily. We and our ancestors have fought too long and shed too much blood for it to give up easily.
 The plan is for Americans to give up their freedom willingly. Socialist reform is the only way that a one world order can be established without a direct military confrontation.

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

{short description of image}{short description of image}{short description of image}{short description of image}{short description of image}{short description of image}


THE MONEY TRAIL | JEREMIAH PROJECT HOME PAGE

Politics | Post-Christian Culture | Apologetics | Bible Prophecy | Dangerous Deceptions | Pro-Life | World Views | Index of Articles| About the Jeremiah Project
This site was designed and is maintained by Data Synthesis © 1996-1999 All Rights Reserved
Send email to Webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.